Global

Brazil: What Can The Western Left Learn From Lula’s Breathtaking Victory?

The extent to which Bolsonaro moved every lever he could against Lula to get reelected cannot be overstated. At the beginning of the year, the federal government pushed through Congress a 50% increase in the direct cash payment program “Auxilio Brasil,” Bolsonaro’s rebranded version of “Bolsa Familia,” a worker’s party program. The move also expanded to include more families in the program. Then, after the first round of voting, his administration used State-owned banks to start offering government-backed micro-loans to beneficiaries of Auxilio Brasil. Bolsonaro also announced over 178 billion reais in public expenditure for 2023 in order to try and appeal to working-class voters.

In addition, Bolsonaro was helped immensely in his campaign by social media platforms, Brazil’s election finance laws, and personal cash donations by wealthy allies. According to researchers at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, YouTube’s algorithm overwhelmingly recommended pro-Bolsonaro content to its users, especially from “Jovem Pan” (55% of first recommendations), a major media ally to Bolsonaro. YouTube’s new algorithmic content policy that seeks to recommend content that is “informative, plural and from reputable sources” may have even privileged Jovem Pan, as it may have been labeled as a mainstream media outlet.

Bolsonaro also counted on a large financial war chest assembled by his business allies. While Brazilian electoral law prohibits corporations from donating to political campaigns, the limits to public contributions are lax. Billionaires can donate up to 10% of their yearly income to campaigns, which netted Bolsonaro with nearly 100 million reais worth of donations, or 21 times more than Lula

Then, on election day, Bolsonaro’s government mobilized the federal highway police force to institute highway checkpoints throughout the country, especially targeting the Northeast and areas of the Southeast, which were known to be part of Lula’s stronghold. When the Electoral Court’s president, Justice Moraes, vetoed those operations on election day, the federal highway police defied his ruling by ignoring his orders to stand down. That was the last straw in a series of illegal measures.

Even against all of this, PT won, and an incumbent president was defeated at the ballot box for the first time since the return to democracy in 1985. To understand how Lula assembled his coalition in a hotly contested race, we must first understand his broad political front. The Worker’s Party leadership recognized that they needed all the help they could muster to beat Bolsonaro; teaming up with others did not mean relinquishing or abdicating its pro-worker roots.

Lula won the election by forming a real coalition. Not the type usually found in western liberal organizations that resembles an abusive relationship, where the centrist liberals dictate the technocratic policies and the leftists are told to just shut up, or they will help elect a right-wing ghoul. In PT’s winning coalition, partners get to debate politics on its merits and decide what is popular with voters and what would be a winning message.

However, this equal footing in the coalition wasn’t just given to us. Brazil isn’t some magical land where liberals are especially enlightened and allow the left to have real input. A great number of them did help to elect Bolsonaro, after all. Brazilian liberals didn’t just easily acquiesce to Lula’s working-class politics. They have fought quite the fight, and the usual suspects are already back to pressuring PT to govern as a neoliberal centrist. Again, they aren’t genius political operators: there is little intelligence in demanding that PT govern like the now defunct center-right PSDB. After all, those policies got us Bolsonaro in the first place and buried PSDB in the process.

The reason for such a balanced coalition isn’t political discourse in the public sphere either. We didn’t “marketplace of ideas” our way into this. While Lula is a phenomenal politician with a singular charisma and talent for engaging his audience, his main trump is power. Simply put, PT is a massive organization born out of a coalition between the labor movement, leftist academics, left-wing clergy, former left-wing guerrillas, and multiple social movements, including MST, the largest. No matter the city or the candidate, PT will always land at least 25% of the vote in Brazil. The party’s size, popularity, organization, and resources enable leadership to wield such power in favor of their own policies and campaigning. Lula himself has also been the most popular president Brazil has ever had. At the end of his second term, he had an 83% approval rating. Those are Saddam Hussein-like numbers. This buys you significant leverage.

Furthermore, Lula is a real moderate. Not the US centrist democrat or Blairite type, but a real one, with negotiating abilities honed from decades in the union movement. He uses these abilities to leverage his power and reach compromises with both sides of his coalition. PT did not simply co-sign the pro-business side’s politics or focus-grouped their way into a platform. They combined policies and campaign strategies from the left and the center-right.

His political talent extends to his ability to foresee political dynamics and tendencies. He knew that Bolsonaro would throw the kitchen sink at him, and he did. Bolsonaro did everything he could, breaking every imaginable law. Lula foresaw that if he was going to beat Bolsonaro, he needed to compete for every single possible vote, and that demanded the broadest of coalitions without compromising democratic values.

Lula’s campaign reflected that. For every center-right politician that joined the partnership, there were also 2 or 3 radical socialist housing activists. Lula managed to get his former rival Alckmin as VP but also got PSOL’s support, the socialist party founded by former PT leftists expelled from the party for being too radical in the 2000s.

For every music video filled with A-list celebrities, there was also a rally at a favela with local activists and community leaders. PT married the 2016 Clinton-esque rhetoric about how Bolsonaro threatened democracy with real substantive policies that sought to address the working class’s material needs. PT’s ads heavily reflected the difficult living conditions of poor Brazilians and spoke on how to put the people’s housing and even nutritional needs back into the Federal Budget.

Lula gained the support of most major bankers in the country but never wavered from denouncing the anti-worker reforms passed with their support after the coup against Dilma Rousseff. The coalition’s platform clearly stated that the new government would repeal such reforms to improve workers’ rights. He even called Dilma’s former VP Temer for what he is: a golpista (coup architect). Yet, he still got his daughter’s vote.

Note: if you are a fan of Brazilian music, you might have immediately thought of this song, “Jorge Maravilha,” composed by Chico Buarque during the military dictatorship, motivated by a rather odd situation he faced after one of his many encounters with the dictatorship’s police.

After being arrested, Chico was asked by a policeman to autograph one of his albums for his daughter. The song, which managed to initially avoid censorship and was released under the pseudonym “Julinho de Adelaide”, masterfully synthesizes the encounter: “A daughter in the hand is worth two parents in the bush… You may not like me, but your daughter does”. The song also gained a life of its own after rumors emerged, later denied by Chico, that it was written to skewer Dictator General Geisel, whose daughter was a big fan of Buarque.

When asked if his cabinet would include equal representation between men and women, he acknowledged that determining who his ministers would be was a task after the election and that it would need to be negotiated within the coalition. He did, however, turn the discussion from representation into distribution and discussed how his government would address issues that disproportionately affect women, like the gender pay gap, childcare, and domestic violence, no matter the gender of the actual minister.

Lula managed to accomplish this due to his ability to show the popularity of his politics. Lula’s 2011 popularity numbers reflect not only how effective his policies were in improving the lives of working-class Brazilians but also how the people actively credited them for it. Liberals ultimately had no chance but to agree to campaign on those credentials. In addition, Bolsonaro’s posture also reflected the popularity of Lula’s redistributive policies. In the months preceding the election and even during the election cycle, Bolsonaro tried to implement many policies that would benefit the working class to reduce Lula’s margins. 

These measures may seem incongruent with Bolsonaro’s politics, especially due to his Minister of the Economy, Chicago boy Paulo Guedes. However, Guedes followed his mentor’s letter to Pinochet to its tee: he used small direct cash payments to the poor to hide the socioeconomic disasters promoted by his economic policies of austerity. Yet again, radical right-wingers display the odd propensity to try to help fascists hold on to power. 

The left, however, quickly managed to neutralize some of these tactics. When these turbo-charged cash payments came to a vote, PT voted in favor of them in a masterful stroke. The party stated that it could not vote against people’s material needs and added this message to its ads: “take the 600 reais with one hand and vote for Lula with the other”.

Lula and his coalition beat Bolsonaro and his shenanigans by assembling a broad front, keeping true to its trendy working-class politics and campaigning whilst allowing input from the center-right. This should inspire any broad-based leftist political project across the West facing such extremists. The Brazilian left joined forces, knowing there is no guarantee it will win every issue in the future coalition government. After all, in 2003, the center-right forced PT’s hand to approve public sector pension reforms, and this ultimately ended in expelling 4 PT congresspeople that would later found PSOL. However, PT and PSOL’s leadership have matured immensely in the last decade, and even our partners from the center-right have been forced to move left due to the disastrous fascist Bolsonaro regime.  And when the time to govern and resist the attacks from the far-right opposition comes, the left knows exactly what to do: hold our coalition together with one hand and push Lula to the left with the other.


Alex Fleck researches Social Media, Law, and Criminology and is especially interested in Politics and Latin America. This story was originally published on Brazil Wire, but the US has blocked visitors from visiting the website.

Show More

Guest Writers

Various authors from around the world whose truth-seeking mission aligns with Middletown Media and Muncie Voice. Academics, government servants, award-winning journalists, authors, and celebrity guests have contributed in the past.

Related Articles

Back to top button